OREGON CRIME VICTIMS LAW CENTER
  • DONATE
  • ABOUT
    • WHAT WE DO
    • STAFF AND BOARD
  • GET INVOLVED
    • DONATE
    • JOIN OUR TEAM
    • HARDY MYERS DINNER
    • CRIME VICTIMS' COMPENSATION
    • STAY INFORMED
    • REQUEST A TRAINING
    • CLE - Access to Justice Representing Victims Who Speak Out
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Children
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Undocumented Crime Victims
  • GET HELP
    • LEGAL REPRESENTATION
    • CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS
    • RESOURCES
  • PRESS
    • IN THE NEWS
    • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT US
  • ESCAPE THIS SITE
  • Blog
  • Executive Director

Lane County Judge Upholds Victim Designation in Murder Case

11/17/2011

 
Following a lengthy contested hearing on Tuesday, Lane County Circuit Court Judge Suzanne Chanti upheld the prosecutor’s determination that a homicide victim’s aunt was a “victim” for purposes of affording her crime victim’s rights in a prosecution for aggravated murder.

Anjelica Swartout is accused of smothering her newborn and putting the body in a dumpster after giving birth in a bathroom of a motel where she worked.  Swartout’s sister, Jewel Sward, alerted authorities after finding inconsistencies in Swartout’s story about what happened to the baby.

Prosecutors designated Sward the “victim” under Article I, Section 42 of the Oregon Constitution, thereby giving her certain rights including the right to attend the entire trial.  Swartout’s attorneys filed a motion to disallow the “victim” designation, arguing that Sward did not meet the statutory or constitutional definition of “victim,” and that allowing her to remain in the courtroom throughout the trial would violate their client’s constitutional due process rights because Sward would be able to tailor her testimony to that of others and she could be referred to as a “victim” before any crime had been proven.

Defense attorney Eve Oldenkamp also argued that the Oregon Constitution’s delegation to the prosecutor of the authority to designate who is a victim of crime violates Swartout’s federal due process rights as applied in this case.  In rejecting Oldenkamp’s argument, Judge Suzanne Chanti made it clear she had done her homework – she referred to the legislative history of Article I, Section 42, and cited to several cases from other jurisdictions in which similar challenges had been rejected. 

 In supporting his reasons for designating Sward as a victim, prosecuting attorney Bob Lane told the court that, among other listed reasons, Sward had given Swartout emotional support during the pregnancy, had been excited about the birth and saddened by the death of the infant, and had planned the baby’s funeral.

 Another motion filed by the defense asked the court to order Sward to show the jury a tattoo she got after the death of Swartout’s baby showing the baby’s name.  Judge Chanti deferred ruling on the motion until time of trial, but indicated after hearing from Sward’s attorney that if she allowed the tattoo to be shown to the jury, a photo of the tattoo would likely be more appropriate “because of privacy and dignity issues.”

Sward was represented by Erin K. Olson, a pro bono attorney appearing on behalf of the Oregon Crime Victims Law Center. 

Comments are closed.

    What's New
    at OCVLC

    Archives

    May 2025
    February 2025
    October 2024
    August 2024
    May 2024
    February 2024
    November 2023
    August 2023
    May 2023
    February 2023
    October 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    January 2021
    September 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    November 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    April 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    July 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

​OCVLC provides free legal representation to crime victims to help them assert their rights within a criminal case.

We provide this service to all Oregon counties, to all victims of crime.

Contact Us


Oregon Crime Victims Law Center
No walk-in services available. Call or email for intake.


Office hours:
Monday-Friday
9AM-5PM PST
Closed most Federal holidays

Call or email for intake:
503-208-8160
​[email protected] ​
​ 

Oregon Crime Victims Law Center
7412 SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy., 
Suite 209 
Portland, OR  97225

Stay in Touch 

    Join our Mailing List 

SUBSCRIBE
  • DONATE
  • ABOUT
    • WHAT WE DO
    • STAFF AND BOARD
  • GET INVOLVED
    • DONATE
    • JOIN OUR TEAM
    • HARDY MYERS DINNER
    • CRIME VICTIMS' COMPENSATION
    • STAY INFORMED
    • REQUEST A TRAINING
    • CLE - Access to Justice Representing Victims Who Speak Out
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Children
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Undocumented Crime Victims
  • GET HELP
    • LEGAL REPRESENTATION
    • CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS
    • RESOURCES
  • PRESS
    • IN THE NEWS
    • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT US
  • ESCAPE THIS SITE
  • Blog
  • Executive Director