OREGON CRIME VICTIMS LAW CENTER
  • DONATE
  • ABOUT
    • WHAT WE DO
    • STAFF AND BOARD
  • GET INVOLVED
    • DONATE
    • JOIN OUR TEAM
    • HARDY MYERS DINNER
    • CRIME VICTIMS' COMPENSATION
    • STAY INFORMED
    • REQUEST A TRAINING
    • CLE - Access to Justice Representing Victims Who Speak Out
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Children
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Undocumented Crime Victims
  • GET HELP
    • LEGAL REPRESENTATION
    • CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS
    • RESOURCES
  • PRESS
    • IN THE NEWS
    • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT US
  • ESCAPE THIS SITE
  • Blog
  • Executive Director

Invasive Discovery Request by Defense Counsel Denied in Columbia County

8/16/2012

 
A Columbia County Circuit Court judge today [Aug. 15] told a criminal defense attorney, in no uncertain terms, that a civil child-custody case was no place to go looking for discovery to assist in a criminal case.

 “Civil cases are not to be used as a tool for discovery in criminal cases,” Judge Jenefer Stenzel Grant said at a hearing on the attorney’s request to be allowed to depose his client’s 12-year-child and her mother and to obtain certain documents from them in the child-custody case.

The attorney’s client is scheduled to begin trial on Aug. 21, before a different Columbia County judge, on charges that he repeatedly sexually assaulted that child in late 2010.

The attorney, who also represents the child’s father in the civil custody case, previously had told that Court that “The documents that are most time sensitive are those documents that will be helpful to respondent in preparing his defense for his criminal case.”

Prior to today’s hearing, Portland attorney and OCVLC Board Secretary/Treasurer Erin Olson, who represents the victim and her mother on victims’ rights issues, had filed a Claim of Violation of Crime Victims’ Rights in connection with the attorney’s requests, arguing that they violated their right, under the Oregon Constitution, to refuse a deposition or other discovery request by the criminal defendant or another person acting on the defendant’s behalf. The mother’s attorney in the child-custody case also had asked the Court for a protective order barring the same discovery requests. Grant agreed to sign the order, which mooted the rights violation claim.

 In doing so, Grant rejected out-of-hand the defense attorney’s argument that the child’s mother had waived her and her daughter’s right to refuse defense discovery requests when she filed the custody petition in May 2012.

 “I completely disagree,” she told the attorney. “I’m just not going to make the civil case a vehicle for discovery in the criminal case. End of story.”

 “Now,” she told him, “what you are left with is what you are entitled to under the criminal discovery rules. I think you are entitled to discovery from the State. I’m not aware that you are entitled to discovery from the victim.”     

 A hearing on one of the defense attorney’s subpoenas for information from the State is scheduled for next week before the criminal-trial judge. The Oregon Department of Justice is opposing that subpoena on the State’s behalf.



Comments are closed.

    What's New
    at OCVLC

    Archives

    February 2025
    October 2024
    August 2024
    May 2024
    February 2024
    November 2023
    August 2023
    May 2023
    February 2023
    October 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    January 2021
    September 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    November 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    April 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    July 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

​OCVLC provides free legal representation to crime victims to help them assert their rights within a criminal case.

We provide this service to all Oregon counties, to all victims of crime.

Contact Us


Oregon Crime Victims Law Center

Office hours:
Monday-Friday
9AM-5PM PST
Closed most Federal holidays

Call or email for intake:
503-208-8160
​[email protected] ​

No walk-in services available, intakes done via phone.
​ 

Oregon Crime Victims Law Center
7412 SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy., 
Suite 209 
Portland, OR  97225

Stay in Touch 

    Join our Mailing List 

SUBSCRIBE
  • DONATE
  • ABOUT
    • WHAT WE DO
    • STAFF AND BOARD
  • GET INVOLVED
    • DONATE
    • JOIN OUR TEAM
    • HARDY MYERS DINNER
    • CRIME VICTIMS' COMPENSATION
    • STAY INFORMED
    • REQUEST A TRAINING
    • CLE - Access to Justice Representing Victims Who Speak Out
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Children
    • CLE - Access to Justice for Undocumented Crime Victims
  • GET HELP
    • LEGAL REPRESENTATION
    • CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS
    • RESOURCES
  • PRESS
    • IN THE NEWS
    • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT US
  • ESCAPE THIS SITE
  • Blog
  • Executive Director